Compare

How ConductCognition compares

Research teams choose between building their own experiments and running ready-made tests. These pages set out the differences with each other product's facts dated and linked to its own pages, and they say where the other product is the better fit.

At a glance

ProductWhat you getNormsHostingPrice modelDetails
ConductCognition54 ready-made tests, scored automaticallyPercentiles where a published norm matches the testMicrosoft Azure East US 2, United States10 free participants per account; pay as you go at $0.99 per participant (academic) or $2.49 (commercial); yearly plans from $249All tests
Gorilla Experiment BuilderTools to build your own tasks, questionnaires and study flowNot stated in Gorilla's public documentation as of 4 October 2026.Microsoft Azure North Europe, IrelandPay as you go at $1.40 per participant (academic) or $3.22 (commercial); yearly subscriptions from $255Full comparison

Gorilla facts checked on 4 October 2026. The full comparison lists the source for each one.

How we keep comparisons fair

  • Every fact about another product links to that product's public page or a published paper, with the date we read it.
  • Each comparison names the studies where the other product is the better choice before the ones where ours is.
  • A fact older than 120 days fails the site's automated checks, so each one is read again before then.
  • Corrections are welcome. Tell us what changed and where you read it.

Product names are trademarks of their owners. ConductScience is not affiliated with them.

See the tests for yourself

Start free and preview any test before you decide.

Start free